survive the heat death of the universe. (Perfectly balanced, as all things should be? In the mean time let us focus on reaching the critical mass of science, technology and wisdom required. So what does it all mean?
So you aren't alive, in any sense of "alive" that we currently think has meaning.But of course "you" ("we") have already long since moved beyond having a corporeal existence, so "atoms" aren't interesting any more.we have no current understanding of "dark matter", or "the inside of black holes" or "the inside of quasars", who knows what other exotic phenomena exist?and this question suffers from incomprehension consider that we can't even imagine what the other side of the sci/tech singularity is going to look like: in another thousand years, if not sooner, we aren't going to be "human" any longer, in the current sense of humanity.
where will it expand into and what if the universes of a multiverse collection were all expanding at the same time? Once this has happened, no more work can be extracted from the universe. You know, just enough to keep a tiny ember burning in our universe. By finding one, spending several billion years traveling to the nearest one, and then somehow grab both ends of the string, cross them over each other to create a loop(though probably a much more complicated pattern), and then pull them together at relavistic speeds to close the loop, and then fly a ship through the loop at exactly the right speed/angle, you The stars might be gone, but the photons they emitted during their life will mostly still be traveling in the universe. There is no way for science to You can imagine how horrible it would be to find that there was a god like physical entity just outside our perception, nurturing us along, only for us to give up on ever joining them. Those events will have to be more and more rare as the energy levels decrease. Entropy in a closed system CANNOT decrease, wave your hands and remove entropy. This isn't a forum, if you're going to ask questions you want an answer to, do so in the comments of the original question. You will receive a verification email shortly.There was a problem. Neither address the original question, but are interesting sidebarsFirst solution: stand still and await your fate, there is nothing you can do when the only thing in the universe is one $0K$ iron atom$/500km^2$. Anybody can ask a question
Kent Hovind's Release From Prison: more information. The universe lacks the mass to cycle. ;) Also...[rough math] $10^{100}$ is how many proton half lives? As in "get out of the universe". I think the question implies a paradox that can't occur. There is the continuous process, where you try to keep a fluidly decreasing amount of energy usage, and the discrete approach, where you subtly collect energy for as long as needed to permit one quick burst of a finite length of energy.
There is enough energy differential available though to build one last device, or space ship, or whatever.So... put on your Ant Man suit, and go chill in the quantum realm?Great answer.
Heat Death of The Universe: ~ 3.65 × 10 102 Days more information. And you know what happened 21 years ago? Then when you are out of dirt start to use other people, when you are out of people well use your limbs, when you are out of limbs you are officially doomed.Note that heat death is an absolute end, all you can do is delay the inevitable.Other solution: dualism. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including
The title refers to a 19th century theory about how the universe will end based on the implications of entropy (a.k.a., the Second Law of Thermodynamics) - hence the "heat death" of the universe. When the universe is facing proton decay, and a civilization is trying to simply hold onto the tiny quantum blurs that keep it alive, imagine how powerful you or I would seem, happily collapsing trillions of waveforms every moment just to pick up a glass of water, nevermind the trillians of irreversable chemical reactions going on in our synapses to feel like we are thirsty.Thus, the balance. Also, the outcome of these events doesn't have to be the same, as we're living in a quantum multiverse.Why? By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Worldbuilding Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for writers/artists using science, geography and culture to construct imaginary worlds and settings. You have some very good points mixed in with your, otherwise, conversational answer. The days of the crew are therefore numbered, because obviously there is no gas station anywhere. Well, we know that entropy always increases with time... but we're And so just as there wasn't any such thing as 'before' the big bang, there is no such thing as 'after' the heat death of the Universe - time will have 'run out'. By wisely scattering the mirrors over several distances you will get plenty of energy for about the same age of the universeThe perspective of the human species will change dramatically in the coming centuries as it has in the 20th century (Before 1923 we thought our universe was just the Milky Way.) You can make a story about ascending to that state to "survive" the end of the universe. You get the idea.But lets assume the question is: can a civilization survive the extinguishing of the last star. You can as for example create a time loop where the end of a day is the beginning of the same day.So the universe is going cold, right? Ronald Weinland: more information. Heat death doesn't occur until you reach maximum entropy, which is something that you can hold off indefinitely if you're able to pull in even relatively small (say, on the order of an M-class star) clumps of matter every few billion years.